Name: Nate Diaz (1st fight) vs Robert Limon 2002 (Bare Knuckle)
Uploaded: 2016-01-17T05:35:58.000Z
Duration: 1 min 26 s
Channel: x1pnesg
Description: Dailymotion — Nate Diaz (1st fight) vs Robert Limon 2002 (Bare Knuckle)

Question 1

Do the fighters or uploaders get paid when I watch a fight on WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT?

Accepted Answer

No — WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT makes money from ads, not from the videos. The site plays mirrored fight footage and earns from the ads around it, never from pay-per-view or subscriptions.

Question 2

How does the consent and monetization fine print on the /submit form work?

Accepted Answer

Every video submitted through the site's /submit form requires the submitter to check a binding box granting WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to display the video and monetize it through advertising. No consent, no submission — the form rejects the upload before anything is stored.

Question 3

What happens if someone owns the rights to a fight video on the site?

Accepted Answer

WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT has a designated DMCA agent and a published notice + counter-notice process at /dmca. A valid takedown notice results in the fight being hidden from the site and its video edge cache purged automatically — usually within minutes of the request.

Question 4

What counts as a fight video on WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT?

Accepted Answer

Real fight footage only: street fights, knockouts, boxing, MMA, brawls, girl fights and bare-knuckle contests. Music videos, movies, trailers and non-fight clips are rejected at submission and filtered from the feed.

Question 5

Are the videos hosted on WATCHPEOPLEFIGHT?

Accepted Answer

No. The site embeds and streams fight videos from their original sources (WorldStarHipHop, Reddit, YouTube) — the video files are never downloaded or stored on our own servers.

Nate Diaz (1st fight) vs Robert Limon 2002 (Bare Knuckle)

UP NEXT

MORE FIGHTS

Comments

Nate Diaz (1st fight) vs Robert Limon 2002 (Bare Knuckle)

UP NEXT

MORE FIGHTS

Comments ↑ jump to topshow more at once

Comments